The definitive chart that shows why Twitter is not Facebook


Quartz

Facebook and Twitter are the two services that jump immediately to mind when somebody says “social media.” But, as revealed in Twitter’s freshly filed IPO prospectus, the two companies couldn’t be more different when it comes to their financials and growth. (Oh, and Twitter doesn’t officially consider itself a social network.)

The chart above compares Twitter and Facebook on the following metrics: quarterly revenue, monthly active users (the number of people who use the site at least once a month), and the average amount of money each company earns for each user (a value that Facebook reports explicitly, but that Quartz had to derive for Twitter). All metrics are compared based on the amount of time that has elapsed since each company’s launch.

It’s clear that Twitter, now seven-and-a-half years old, is not nearly as large as Facebook was at the same age; it’s also not growing at nearly…

View original post 13 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: